37 Comments
User's avatar
Dave's avatar

Well done. Very detailed.

Expand full comment
Evan Hellmuth's avatar

Written clearly and well-researched. Great find

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Thanks mate pls give it a restack

Expand full comment
Tracy Chartier's avatar

I work in the healthcare field, with dialysis centers making up a small portion of my accounts. This informative article really hit home. This could be HUGE, not just from the financial perspective we on this platform are looking at, but for so many patients. Thank you for this info. Looking forward to part 2! 🙂

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Thanks Tracy! Will be very valuable to get your insights on the thread I have started in the Subscriber Chat!

Expand full comment
CB's avatar

Great read so far, can’t wait for part II

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Umanath Agarwal's avatar

Very exhaustive in-depth study by Archetype Capital. Keep it up.

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Thanks man

Expand full comment
Chris Mascitelli's avatar

love your conviction! hope you have a winner.

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

I hope so too. Part 2 will be a lot more nitty gritty detailed

Expand full comment
TheShamelessCloner's avatar

That is making valuation really hard on this, as its all based on the different scenarios. ( But i agree even if they just reach the BEAR case scenario, this is cheap). I wonder if there are any more risks involved not mentioned, as the medical business is kinda "hard". Its really good they already have contracts. I wonder how fast such products can be really deployed. When i look at Sanuwave or Covalon ( all different products, same idea/area) growth can really happen fast but sounds too "sure" :D i am always skeptical if things are too sure ^^

Expand full comment
TheShamelessCloner's avatar

ALso one additional thing i want to point out. There are also citrate based solutions which are doing (almost) the same. So some sort of competition within there.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6753535/

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Thanks! I know they already use citrate but haven’t seen that they have been as effective. Will look deeper into this for part 2.

Expand full comment
TheShamelessCloner's avatar

That would be great :) the upside lies in the speed of execution and deployment with current valuation .

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

You’re right. The upside lies in 2 factors only-

1- The deployment/rollout speed with the current TDAPA reimbursement in place. Essentially how much they can get at the price of $250 per vial. and the drop-off until the TDAPA add on ends. (This is hugely important to the upside).

2- The price they’re able to negotiate after. It’s highly highly unlikely it will be close to even $150 a vial because the currently kidney bundle per session is somewhere like $265 for everything. It would be crazy if Medicare was paying almost half the bundle rate for just one product. I think long-term it comes down a lot more, and this will form the basis of part 2.

Expand full comment
Richard Geary's avatar

Very well done!!!! Looking forward to part 2!

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Almost done with it

Expand full comment
George's avatar

Nice find. This has an extremely skewed payoff profile.

Expand full comment
ingvar kurtaren's avatar

Thanks! Will buy stocks!!!!

Expand full comment
David's avatar

Just seeing your account now via X. Planning to do a deep dive later today. Impressive picks!

Expand full comment
Anki's avatar

could you please clarify add on payment from 3rd year.

This is mentioned in this link. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/end-stage-renal-disease-esrd/esrd-pps-transitional-drug-add-payment-adjustment

"A new renal dialysis drug or biological product is included in the calculation of the post-TDAPA add-on payment adjustment for a period of 3 years. CMS annually calculates the post-TDAPA add-on payment adjustment for each quarter of the upcoming CY, based on the most recent 12 months of claims data. For drugs or biological products that lack a full year’s worth of utilization data when the annual final rule is developed, CMS will publish the post-TDAPA add-on payment adjustment amount in a CR once 12 months of utilization data are available (89 FR 89135 through 98136). The post-TDAPA add-on payment adjustment amount for a drug or biological product is the total expenditure for a new drug divided by total ESRD PPS expenditures during the same period, reduced by a case-mix standardization factor and a 65 percent risk-sharing factor and inflated by the market basket price proxy for pharmaceuticals."

Example

defenClath last 12 month revenue: $400M

Total ESRD PPS Expenditures: $ 20B

ESRD PPS bundle: 271$

Summary of the Calculation

Raw Ratio: $400M / $20B = 2.0%

After 65% Risk Sharing: 2.0% × 0.65 = 1.3%

After Case‑Mix Adjustment (–10%): 1.3% × 0.90 = 1.17%

After Market Basket Inflation (×1.03): 1.17% × 1.03 ≈ 1.21%

Add-on Amount : 271 × 0.0121 ≈ $ 3.28

I could not find anywhere direct 65% of WAC price from 3rd year. could you please clarify.

Expand full comment
JP Buongiorno's avatar

See here from latest CMS rule: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/calendar-year-2024-end-stage-renal-disease-esrd-prospective-payment-system-pps-final-rule-cms-1782-f?utm_source=chatgpt.com

"...This new add-on payment adjustment will support Medicare ESRD beneficiaries’ continued access to new renal dialysis drugs and biological products. This payment adjustment will be case-mix adjusted and set at 65% of estimated expenditure levels for the given renal dialysis drug or biological product in the prior year. The post-TDAPA payment adjustment will be applied to all ESRD PPS payments for a period of three years..."

Expand full comment
Jim Davis's avatar

why did this show up in my email , AFTER it lifted 10% on the day

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

Yeah sorry man. I tried to get it out soon. But to be honest with you I’m expecting this thing to do 60% fluctuations either side

Expand full comment
Théodore Huber's avatar

Thank you very much 🙏

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Quit question about the paid membership. Are there more picks available for the paid membership? Just wondering what is different than the free membership. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

I haven't gone paid yet.

Expand full comment
Chris Mascitelli's avatar

When you look it gives and option for paid. Also new to substack and find it a bit of a maze so I could be wrong.

Expand full comment
Archetype Capital's avatar

I haven’t set it up yet, so not sure

Expand full comment
Siddharth Kumar's avatar

Amazing write up! Very clear and looking forward to part 2.

Expand full comment